How did everything, including life, came to light? There was a Creator by accident or was that everything in the universe, including all forms of life came into existence? The only other option is that everything that exists, materialized out of nowhere. Immanuel Kant against the princes of Serendip: The science evolve through blind chance or intelligent design? attempts to answer this question. Kant's answer is: "Accidental observations, made in obedience to any plan previously thought, can not be made to get a law must be reasonable, that alone is concerned to discover ... Reason must approach nature in the nature of a student who listens to everything the teacher has to say, but as a judge appointed, which forces the witness to answer questions that he himself has made. "Scientists must not remain under the domain of experience. We should pay attention or accidental observation nor listen to Nature as if we were naive pupils. We should strive to seek the objective truth in the facts. For example, the apparent lack of evidence is what has kept evolution as a theory for well over a hundred years. Evolution remains hypothetical and anthropologists argue that ... unproven.Evolutionists the Stone Age lasted for at least 100,000 years, during which the world population of Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon was approximately constant between one and 10 million. All that time buried their dead with artifacts. With this scenario, they would have buried at least four billion bodies. If the evolutionary time scale is correct, buried bones should be able to last much more human than 100,000 years. Like the dinosaurs presumably, would be incalculable fossils.By their time scale, it is assumed that there would be four billion Stone Age skeletons and buried artifacts surely countless. There should be millions of them, in fact, given the enormous amount of time they claim, but only a few thousand bones and fragments were never found and these are too few to satisfy the theory of the Stone Age and the thousands of years was supposed to have taken place. Why worry about a "missing link" when the chain is missing? Nearly half a million fossils have been discovered and classified, but not even a single set of transitional fossils (such as reptiles become birds) of a single species of animal or mammal, has never been found in all human history. They can not find what you never accidentally existed.An world, with the possibility of a mechanism of life forms, must fall upward against the axiom of science that nothing comes from nothing. Cause and effect requires a certain Causer before anything. Ability to Kant, is an excuse for ignorance. Chance is not even a name, you can do anything by itself, does not have the power to effect, not an x-factor, as many believe. And the case is not composed of physical matter. Regardless of these facts, those who believe in evolution or carry a disbelief of creationism or intelligent design, a case that the x-factor in all things come into existence. Otherwise, they must admit I do not know how matter, life and Malthus, came into existence. They simply do not know and can not appease the theories of (subjective). We should expect science to deal only with facts (objective), approaching things rationally and logically. They do not have. Evolution remains in textbooks. Believing in something does not make it true. Trying to find a real account fairy.Another tooth is that it is impossible for matter to create itself, spontaneously, out of nowhere. Evolutionary theory is of no help: it does not explain how matter is formed and Malthus by extension, can not explain the origin of life. In fact, over time, no additional gain Thurs DNA of cells (which, in evolution, must be present for the stages of transition), that the integrity of the DNA dissolved. Each cell is like a carbon copy of the original. With each passing day, the cells are copies of each other and becoming a bit 'less like the original. The cells are not changing, as they age. Natural selection produces the extinction of species, not a proliferation of it. Thurs cells do not improve or become greater over time, but exactly the opposite. The law of entropy says that cells break down or weaken over time and lose their cellular integrity. It 's the exact opposite of the approach evolution.The general for those who do not believe in a Creator, the argument or theory is an equation: Space + Time + Chance = Everything. How, in what in reality is, 0 + 0 + 0 = everything? The space did not cause the material to come into existence, nor time. Nor can influence the probability or create events. Can be derived from non-being ... spontaneous generation of matter from nothing? They manage to actually find something to happen or something cause? No. Chance is only the probability of something occurring. We must come before "because" before you can actually see. And a cause logically demand a Causer ... and a creator. Chance is powerless. He can make something happen or create something from nothing. This is a non-being.I met an old school mate away from our home town in a big city. I thought, this is unbelievable. What are the odds of this? Lot of zeros, I'm sure, but I did not go to the city to meet him. He came not to the same city to meet me. It 'was pure coincidence or by chance. But the occasion does not make me go to this city. I did. But there was already the first to have this chance meeting. I made myself to make Sun the same for him. Chance Chance is a quotient, a mathematical equation. But you must have the numbers to begin with or you can not even write an equation. Chance happen is unable to create or to cause something. That leaves only one possibility. The cause must be an intelligent designer, a creator. There is no other way to explain why # in which the matter ... throughout the universe and all life forms. [EXTRACT] How did everything, including life, as in Existence? There was a Creator or was it just a coincidence that everything in the universe, including all forms of life Came Into Existence? The only other option is that everything that exists, materialized out of nowhere. Immanuel Kant against the princes of Serendip: The science evolve through blind chance or intelligent design? Attempts to answer this question. Kant's answer is: "Accidental observations, made in obedience to no previously thought-out plan calculated, can never be made to obtain a necessary law, 'which is the only reason to discover ... Reason must approach in question nature of the character does not have a pupil who listens to everything the teacher has to say, but as an appointed judge who compels the witness to answer the questions that really has himself formulated. "Scientists REMAIN under the domain of experience. We must not listen to the accidental observation nor listen to Nature, as if we where pupils naive. If we strive to seek the objective truth in the facts. For example, the apparent lack of evidence is what has kept evolution as a theory for well over a hundred years. Evolution remains hypothetical and anthropologists unproven.Evolutionists claims ... That the Stone Age lasted for at least 100,000 years, during which the world population of Neanderthal and Cro-Magnon was approximately constant between one and 10 million. All That they buried their dead time with objects. With this scenario, they would have buried at least four billion bodies. If the evolutionary time scale is correct buried human bones should be able to last much longer than 100,000 years. Like the dinosaurs presumably, there fossils.By countless Should Have Been time-scales, it is assumed that there would be four billion Stone Age skeletons, buried artifacts and countless course. In the case of several million of them, in fact, given the enormous amount of time, they argue, but only a few thousand bones and fragments were never found and these are too few to accommodate the stone age and the thousands of years theory was supposed to have taken place. Why worry about a "missing link" when the chain is missing? Nearly half a million fossils have been discovered and cataloged, but not even a single set of transitional fossils (such as reptiles, birds Become) of a single species of animal or mammal, has never been found in all human history. They can not find what you ever accidentally existed.An world, with the possibility of a mechanism of life forms, must fall upward against the axiom of science that from nothing comes nothing. Cause and effect requires a certain Causer before anything. Ability to Kant, is an excuse for ignorance. Chance is not even a name, you can do nothing of himself, has no power to effect, not an x-factor, as many believe. And the case is not composed of physical matter. Regardless of these facts, To those who believe in evolution or carry a disbelief of creationism or intelligent design, a case that the x-factor in all things came into existence. Otherwise, they must admit that I do not know how matter, life, and thus came into existence. Just know and can not appease Thurs only theories (subjective). If we expect science to deal only with facts (objective), approaching things rationally and logically. They do not have. Evolution remains in textbooks. Believing in something does not make it true. Trying to find a real account fairy.Another tooth is that it is impossible for matter to create itself, spontaneously, out of nowhere. Evolutionary theory is of no help: Do not explain how matter is formed and, by extension therefore, can not explain the origin of life. In fact, over time, the cells do not have additional DNA Thurs (which, in evolution, must be present for the stages of transition), have dissolved the integrity of the DNA. Each cell is like a carbon copy of the original. Every day that passes, the cells are copies of each other and becoming a bit 'less like the original. The cells are not evolving, you are aging. Natural selection produces the extinction of species, not a proliferation of it. Cells Improve or play does not become greater over time, but exactly the opposite. The law of entropy says that cells break down or weaken over time and lose their cellular integrity. It 's the exact opposite of the approach evolution.The general for those who do not believe in a Creator, the argument or theory is an equation: Space + Time + Chance = Everything. How, in what in reality is, 0 + 0 + 0 = everything? The space did not cause the material to come into existence, nor time. Nor can influence the probability or create events. How can the non-being ... spontaneous generation of matter from nothing? They manage to actually find something to happen or something cause? No. Chance is only the probability of something occurring. We must come before "because" before you can actually see. And a cause logically demand a Causer ... and a creator. Chance is powerless. He can make something happen or create something from nothing. This is a non-brokered being.I met an old school friend from our hometown of a large city. I thought, this is unbelievable. What are the odds of this? Lot of zeros, I'm sure, but I did not go to the city to meet him. He came not to examine the city to meet me. It 'was pure coincidence or by chance. But the occasion does not make me go to this city. I did. But I have already existed before we have this chance. I know I caused myself to do. The same for him. Chance possibility is a quotient of a mathematical equation. But you must have the numbers to begin with or you can not even write an equation. Chance happen is unable to create or to cause something. That leaves only one possibility. The causes must be an intelligent designer, a creator. There is no other way to explain the reason for all the matter in which ... the universe and all life forms.
0 ความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น